Outgoing Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy directly accused President Donald Trump of treating Congress as “merely an appendage” during a Sunday interview on CBS News’s Face the Nation, citing the administration’s failure to brief lawmakers on the ongoing war with Iran. The sharp criticism from the Republican—who lost his primary in May after Trump backed a challenger—marks one of the few instances of a GOP politician openly confronting the president over war powers.

Cassidy’s remarks stem from a heated Capitol Hill exchange last week, during which he voiced support for a war powers resolution intended as a symbolic rebuke of the White House. The senator’s stance underscores deepening unease even among some Republicans about the scope of executive authority in military engagements, particularly as the 60-day ceasefire with Iran unravels amid fresh strikes by both sides over the weekend.

The partisan landscape remains sharply divided: most congressional Republicans have largely deferred to Trump on Iran policy, while Democrats have pressed for tighter oversight and a reassertion of congressional war powers. Cassidy’s defection, however limited, signals that the issue may fracture party unity as the conflict escalates and the ceasefire negotiated in April appears increasingly fragile.

Public opinion on the Iran war remains split, with recent polls showing a majority of Americans favoring congressional approval before sustained military action. Cassidy’s criticism taps into that sentiment as his own political fate—defeat in a primary driven by Trump’s endorsement—illustrates the risks for Republicans who break ranks. The episode could amplify pressure on swing-district GOP members to distance themselves from the White House heading into the midterms.

Some analysts view Cassidy’s parting shot as largely symbolic, given that Trump’s challenger has already secured Cassidy’s seat. But the confrontation highlights a growing constitutional debate over war powers that has gained urgency as the U.S.-Iran conflict strains diplomatic channels and threatens regional stability.