Australia's social media ban for under-16s has had little impact on teenagers' scrolling habits, researchers said Thursday in one of the first evaluations of the world-leading measures. The findings challenge the effectiveness of age-based restrictions as a policy tool.
The ban was introduced to curb harms like cyberbullying and exposure to inappropriate content. Policymakers hailed the law as a global template, but early data suggests it has not curbed teen engagement or time on platforms.
Researchers did not specify exact usage data but described the effect as “little impact.” The study represents one of the earliest independent assessments globally of such age-restriction laws. No financial or engagement figures were cited.
This raises questions about enforcement and the role of parental supervision. Critics argue that blanket bans may push teens to less regulated corners of the internet. The Australian government has not yet responded to the findings.
Some experts contend that education and platform design changes may prove more effective than outright prohibitions. More comprehensive studies are expected in the coming months.